Majaess 65
0.69
UTI
0.58
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.44
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
9.8 [arcmin]
- CN 0.58 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.44 Poorly studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Majaess 65 is a moderately populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with 3 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 87.452 | 27.036 | 1.044 | -0.331 | -1.012 | -0.048 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 87.428 | 27.075 | 0.974 | -0.258 | -1.063 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 87.428 | 27.075 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 87.438 | 27.076 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 87.428 | 27.075 | 0.974 | -0.258 | -1.063 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 87.433 | 27.108 | â | -0.275 | -0.981 | 2.114 |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 87.433 | 27.108 | â | -3.0 | 3.47 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 87.433 | 27.108 | â | -3.0 | 3.47 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.94 | 0.70 | â | 51 | 0.062 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.94 | 0.77 | â | 161 | â | 127 | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.93 | 0.81 | â | 113 | -0.048 | 98* | 0.50 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.94 | 0.77 | â | 161 | 0.006 | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 0.97 | 0.88 | â | 46 | 0.014 | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.