VDB 92
(vdBergh 92; FSR 1188; CMa06)
0.95
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
8.9 [arcmin]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
VDB 92 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 106.049 | -11.481 | 0.864 | -4.409 | 1.565 | 24.517 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 106.038 | -11.475 | 0.842 | -4.54 | 1.618 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 106.043 | -11.488 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 106.037 | -11.442 | 0.875 | -4.385 | 1.583 | 22.272 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 106.038 | -11.475 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 106.099 | -11.456 | 0.869 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 106.037 | -11.442 | 0.875 | -4.385 | 1.583 | 22.272 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 106.069 | -11.494 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 106.186 | -11.333 | 0.866 | -3.997 | 1.506 | â |
| Santos-Silva et al. | 2021 | 106.11 | -11.45 | 0.85 | -4.2 | 1.52 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 106.043 | -11.488 | 0.834 | -4.539 | 1.607 | 27.58 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 106.038 | -11.475 | 0.842 | -4.54 | 1.618 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 106.038 | -11.475 | 0.842 | -4.54 | 1.618 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 105.975 | -11.533 | 0.86 | -4.469 | 1.461 | 25.6 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 106.038 | -11.475 | â | â | â | 27.99 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 106.038 | -11.475 | 0.842 | -4.54 | 1.618 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 105.975 | -11.533 | â | -1.737 | 2.196 | 17.5 |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 105.975 | -11.533 | â | -2.1 | 3.87 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 105.975 | -11.533 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 105.973 | -11.489 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 105.97 | -11.53 | â | 0.2 | â | 17.5 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 105.973 | -11.489 | â | â | â | â |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 106.0 | -11.579 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 105.97 | -11.49 | â | -5.22 | 2.52 | 17.33 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 106.02 | -11.47 | â | -5.11 | 2.37 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 105.975 | -11.533 | â | -2.1 | 3.87 | 17.5 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.89 | 0.83 | â | 5 | -0.366 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.11 | 0.98 | â | 6 | â | 559 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 735* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 8 | â | 363 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.12 | 1.16 | â | 3 | -0.150 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 2.38 | 4 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.08 | 0.97 | â | 7 | -0.076 | 827* | 0.52 | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 1.40 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Santos-Silva et al. | 2021 | 1.10* | 0.96* | â | 10* | -0.150* | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.11 | 0.98 | â | 6 | 0.025 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.19 | 1.27 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.15 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 1.08 | 0.93 | â | 7 | 0.805 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.15 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.15 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.42 | 1.04 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.43 | â | â | 39 | â | 589 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.50 | 0.78 | â | 39 | â | 658* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 1.50 | 0.78 | â | 39 | â | 151 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.50 | 0.78 | â | 39 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.43 | 0.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.50 | 0.78 | â | 39 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.