VDB 80

(vdBergh 80)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.82 UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.79
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 10.6 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.76 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.79 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
VDB 80 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Wood sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 97.712 -9.599 1.013 -3.254 0.48 37.033
Almeida et al. 2025 97.747 -9.621 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 97.635 -9.548 0.976 -3.258 0.736 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 97.731 -9.633 1.001 -3.25 0.569 35.818
Celli et al. 2024 97.739 -9.625 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 97.43 -9.628 1.003 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 97.731 -9.633 1.001 -3.25 0.569 35.818
Almeida et al. 2023 97.762 -9.612 – – – –
He et al. 2022 97.795 -9.583 1.029 -3.227 0.459 –
Dias et al. 2021 97.747 -9.621 1.026 -3.285 0.481 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 97.739 -9.625 1.025 -3.298 0.418 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 97.739 -9.625 1.025 -3.298 0.418 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 97.739 -9.625 1.025 -3.298 0.418 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 97.71 -9.654 – -3.45 -11.64 –
Dias et al. 2002 97.708 -9.655 – -3.45 -11.64 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Almeida et al. 2025 0.95 1.73 – 6 – 280 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.91 1.50 – 10 -0.141 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 217* – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 6 – 129 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.29 1.99 – 9 -0.270 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.95 2.00 2.56 6 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.94 2.11 – 9 -0.053 249* 0.72 –
He et al. 2022 – 2.40 – 6 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.95 1.73 – 6 -0.148 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.91 1.53 – 6 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.95 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.95 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.15 3.76 – 14 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.10 1.89 – 5 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸