UPK 90

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.72 UTI
0.43
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 8.1 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.43 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
UPK 90 is a poorly populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 299.773 28.418 1.233 -0.835 -5.747 -14.868
Li et al. 2025 299.777 28.422 1.228 -0.824 -5.705 –
Almeida et al. 2025 299.741 28.424 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 299.734 28.418 1.2 -0.871 -5.646 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 299.726 28.434 1.227 -0.837 -5.698 -13.589
Cavallo et al. 2024 299.769 28.437 1.236 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 299.726 28.434 1.227 -0.837 -5.698 -13.589
He et al. 2022 299.76 28.437 1.244 -0.806 -5.734 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 299.765 28.457 1.242 -0.85 -5.752 –
Dias et al. 2021 299.741 28.424 1.236 -0.825 -5.728 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 299.777 28.422 1.228 -0.824 -5.705 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 299.773 28.419 1.231 -0.837 -5.719 –
Sim et al. 2019 299.787 28.408 – -0.83 -5.72 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.92 1.07 – 179 0.144 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.79 0.96 – 385 – 123 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.79 0.85 – 101 0.075 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 110* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.83 1.07 – 49 -0.070 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.78 0.80 0.80 122 – – – –
He et al. 2022 – 1.25 – 50 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.78 – – 55 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.79 0.96 – 385 0.076 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.79 0.85 – 49 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.79 – – – – – – –
Sim et al. 2019 0.79 – – 45 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸