UPK 80
0.64
UTI
0.42
CN
0.61
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
14.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.42 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.61 Moderately dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 80 is a poorly populated, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 293.932 | 28.169 | 1.121 | 1.207 | -1.055 | -15.227 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 293.914 | 28.16 | 1.127 | 1.217 | -1.024 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 293.865 | 28.264 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 293.995 | 28.266 | 1.077 | 1.206 | -1.054 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 293.843 | 28.128 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 293.843 | 28.128 | 1.087 | 1.254 | -0.948 | -18.033 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 293.971 | 28.221 | 1.092 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 293.843 | 28.128 | 1.087 | 1.254 | -0.948 | -18.033 |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 293.914 | 28.16 | 1.141 | 1.222 | -1.054 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 293.865 | 28.264 | 1.115 | 1.229 | -1.015 | -44.645 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 293.914 | 28.16 | 1.127 | 1.217 | -1.024 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 293.901 | 28.272 | 1.107 | 1.23 | -1.024 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 293.834 | 28.131 | â | 1.19 | -1.01 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.94 | 0.44 | â | 538 | 0.356 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.88 | 0.48 | â | 708 | â | 96 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.90 | 0.44 | â | 570 | 0.215 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.070* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 62* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.83 | 0.64 | â | 407 | 0.210 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.88 | 0.54 | 0.81 | 262 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.88 | â | â | 389 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.88 | 0.48 | â | 708 | 0.215 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.90 | 0.44 | â | 380 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.88 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.88 | â | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.