UPK 642
0.51
UTI
0.27
CN
0.21
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
17.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.27 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.21 Very loose
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 642 is a poorly populated, very loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 263.081 | -44.242 | 1.033 | 2.274 | -4.324 | 9.611 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 263.081 | -44.242 | 1.025 | 2.317 | -4.331 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 263.116 | -44.28 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 263.15 | -44.228 | 1.001 | 2.271 | -4.384 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 263.026 | -44.321 | 1.025 | 2.268 | -4.393 | 13.092 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 263.109 | -44.216 | 1.031 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 263.026 | -44.321 | 1.025 | 2.268 | -4.393 | 13.092 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 263.116 | -44.28 | 1.024 | 2.345 | -4.35 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 263.081 | -44.242 | 1.025 | 2.317 | -4.331 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 263.075 | -44.32 | 1.019 | 2.347 | -4.344 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 263.089 | -44.276 | â | 2.31 | -4.29 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.92 | 0.39 | 0.79 | 124 | 0.175 | 72 | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.85 | 0.45 | â | 72 | -0.046 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.94 | 0.45 | â | 124 | â | 86 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.92 | 0.27 | â | 200 | 0.210 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 58(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.88 | 0.20 | â | 251 | 0.140 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.92 | 0.39 | 0.79 | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.89 | â | â | 170 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.94 | 0.45 | â | 124 | 0.210 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.92 | 0.27 | â | 166 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.95 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.95 | â | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.