UPK 630
0.73
UTI
0.49
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
5.8 [arcmin]
- CN 0.49 Poorly populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 630 is a poorly populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 249.188 | -51.282 | 1.078 | -1.805 | -2.28 | -1.025 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 249.193 | -51.304 | 1.047 | -1.76 | -2.289 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 249.19 | -51.323 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 249.265 | -51.251 | 1.045 | -1.746 | -2.315 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 249.174 | -51.265 | 1.069 | -1.818 | -2.311 | -2.23 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 249.188 | -51.318 | 1.079 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 249.174 | -51.265 | 1.069 | -1.818 | -2.311 | -2.23 |
| He et al. | 2022 | 249.13 | -51.287 | 1.091 | -1.814 | -2.254 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 249.19 | -51.323 | 1.055 | -1.768 | -2.291 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 249.193 | -51.304 | 1.047 | -1.76 | -2.289 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 249.182 | -51.303 | 1.047 | -1.763 | -2.294 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 249.187 | -51.295 | â | -1.75 | -2.3 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.87 | 0.58 | â | 44 | 0.071 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.90 | 0.57 | â | 113 | â | 125 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.89 | 0.25 | â | 85 | 0.192 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 168* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.90 | 0.78 | â | 43 | 0.120 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.89 | 0.55 | 0.77 | 96 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.65 | â | 89 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.87 | â | â | 117 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.90 | 0.57 | â | 113 | 0.192 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.89 | 0.25 | â | 112 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.93 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.93 | â | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.