UPK 62
0.66
UTI
0.34
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
5.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.34 Poorly populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 62 is a poorly populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Close
High extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 289.693 | 20.828 | 1.112 | -0.44 | -5.441 | 1.067 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 289.727 | 20.826 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 289.731 | 20.817 | 1.09 | -0.407 | -5.416 | 0.61 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 289.711 | 20.826 | 1.103 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 289.731 | 20.817 | 1.09 | -0.407 | -5.416 | 0.61 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 289.712 | 20.785 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 289.713 | 20.83 | 1.112 | -0.423 | -5.441 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 289.727 | 20.826 | 1.075 | -0.452 | -5.418 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 289.727 | 20.823 | 1.085 | -0.451 | -5.423 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 289.727 | 20.823 | 1.091 | -0.452 | -5.401 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 289.705 | 20.825 | â | -0.43 | -5.41 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.89 | 3.42 | â | 11 | â | 129 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 333* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.04 | 4.42 | â | 78 | 0.400 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.87 | 4.24 | 2.57 | 168 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.87 | 3.75 | â | 229 | -0.041 | 213* | 0.75 | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 4.85 | â | 56 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.89 | 3.42 | â | 11 | 0.021 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.89 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.90 | â | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.