UPK 606

(OCSN 318)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.77 UTI
0.66
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 52.5 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.66 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
UPK 606 is a moderately populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a low-mass, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Very close Low extinction Low mass Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as a moving group.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 216.227 -46.362 5.911 -20.205 -16.865 8.016
Li et al. 2025 216.12 -46.39 5.877 -20.156 -16.704 –
Almeida et al. 2025 216.13 -46.363 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 216.214 -46.097 5.893 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 215.891 -46.424 5.898 -20.06 -16.891 7.448
Qin et al. 2023 216.03 -46.44 5.89 -20.03 -16.83 6.48
He et al. 2022 216.025 -46.292 5.915 -20.229 -16.923 –
Dias et al. 2021 216.13 -46.363 5.882 -20.147 -16.551 10.435
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 216.12 -46.39 5.877 -20.156 -16.704 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 216.12 -46.39 5.911 -20.121 -16.817 –
Sim et al. 2019 215.922 -46.337 – -20.26 -16.8 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.16 0.21 – 22 -0.062 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.17 0.13 – 17 – 32 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.17 0.86 – 17 0.060 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.17 0.34 0.54 10 – – – –
Qin et al. 2023 0.18 0.22 – 13 – – – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.05 – 14 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.17 0.13 – 17 -0.052 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.17 – – – – – – –
Sim et al. 2019 0.17 – – 13 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸