UPK 55

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.73 UTI
0.64
CN
0.88
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 18.1 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.64 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 0.88 Dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
UPK 55 is a moderately populated, dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 296.809 10.421 1.261 -1.438 -6.908 -9.477
Li et al. 2025 296.812 10.428 1.252 -1.383 -6.87 –
Almeida et al. 2025 296.798 10.421 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 296.723 10.487 1.217 -1.423 -6.868 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 296.669 10.433 1.243 -1.437 -6.885 -15.757
Cavallo et al. 2024 296.799 10.451 1.248 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 296.669 10.433 1.243 -1.437 -6.885 -15.757
Almeida et al. 2023 296.773 10.434 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 296.844 10.401 1.258 -1.441 -6.884 –
Dias et al. 2021 296.798 10.421 1.253 -1.386 -6.86 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 296.812 10.428 1.252 -1.383 -6.87 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 296.768 10.421 1.251 -1.411 -6.859 –
Sim et al. 2019 296.7 10.463 – -1.43 -6.86 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.79 0.41 – 404 0.353 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.77 0.74 – 247 – 135 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.77 0.54 – 223 0.042 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 208* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.81 0.72 – 115 0.400 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.76 0.68 1.30 95 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.78 0.76 – 308 -0.048 192* 0.68 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.76 – – 251 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.77 0.74 – 247 0.042 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.77 0.54 – 214 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.78 – – – – – – –
Sim et al. 2019 0.78 – – 89 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸