UPK 542

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.33 UTI
0.26
CN
0.1
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.39
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 2.3 [pc], 0.5 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.26 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 0.1 Very loose
  • CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
  • Clit 0.39 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
UPK 542 is a poorly populated, very loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 134.121 -54.381 1.209 -4.871 2.651 26.58
Li et al. 2025 134.258 -54.303 1.198 -4.897 2.508 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 134.141 -54.396 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 134.113 -54.299 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 133.923 -54.6 1.152 -4.977 2.697 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 134.24 -54.469 1.198 -4.909 2.747 25.18
Cavallo et al. 2024 134.141 -54.396 1.207 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 134.24 -54.469 1.198 -4.909 2.747 25.18
Almeida et al. 2023 134.383 -54.267 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 134.258 -54.303 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 134.113 -54.299 1.222 -4.944 2.582 14.159
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 134.258 -54.303 1.198 -4.897 2.508 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 134.169 -54.336 1.213 -4.977 2.607 –
Sim et al. 2019 134.108 -54.331 – -4.87 2.56 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 0.81 0.565 0.33 612 -0.050 88 0.78 0
Li et al. 2025 1.01 0.84 – 672 0.051 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – 0.000(5) – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.80 0.68 – 434 – 78 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.81 0.49 – 89 -0.050 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 0.80 0.39 0.33 117 – 47(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.84 1.03 – 1380 -0.320 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.80 0.39 0.33 117 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.77 0.64 – 593 -0.229 99(1) 0.78 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.79 – – 631 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 0.81 0.49 – 631 – 125 – 0(1)
Dias et al. 2021 0.80 0.68 – 434 -0.050 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.81 0.49 – 631 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.81 – – – – – – –
Sim et al. 2019 0.83 – – 631 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸