UPK 542
0.51
UTI
0.26
CN
0.28
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.75
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
17.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.26 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.28 Loose
- CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
- Clit 0.75 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 542 is a poorly populated, loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 134.121 | -54.381 | 1.209 | -4.871 | 2.651 | 26.58 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 134.258 | -54.303 | 1.198 | -4.897 | 2.508 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 134.141 | -54.396 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 134.113 | -54.299 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 133.923 | -54.6 | 1.152 | -4.977 | 2.697 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 134.24 | -54.469 | 1.198 | -4.909 | 2.747 | 25.18 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 134.141 | -54.396 | 1.207 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 134.24 | -54.469 | 1.198 | -4.909 | 2.747 | 25.18 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 134.383 | -54.267 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 134.113 | -54.299 | 1.222 | -4.944 | 2.582 | 14.159 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 134.258 | -54.303 | 1.198 | -4.897 | 2.508 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 134.169 | -54.336 | 1.213 | -4.977 | 2.607 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 134.108 | -54.331 | â | -4.87 | 2.56 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.01 | 0.84 | â | 672 | 0.051 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | 0.000* | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.80 | 0.68 | â | 434 | â | 78 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.81 | 0.49 | â | 89 | -0.050 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 47* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.84 | 1.03 | â | 1380 | -0.320 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.80 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 117 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.77 | 0.64 | â | 593 | -0.229 | 99* | 0.78 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.79 | â | â | 631 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.80 | 0.68 | â | 434 | -0.050 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.81 | 0.49 | â | 631 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.81 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.83 | â | â | 631 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.