UPK 533
(OCSN 311)
0.66
UTI
0.75
CN
0.5
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
63.6 [arcmin]
- CN 0.75 Rich
- Cdens 0.5 Moderately dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 533 is a rich, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and age parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Very close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 123.087 | -52.563 | 2.93 | -6.861 | 2.59 | 26.678 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 122.798 | -52.529 | 2.893 | -6.788 | 2.615 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 122.968 | -52.314 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 123.418 | -52.495 | 2.896 | -6.958 | 2.517 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 123.379 | -52.266 | â | â | â | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 123.57 | -52.4 | 2.95 | -7.0 | 2.65 | 28.33 |
| He et al. | 2022 | 123.549 | -52.543 | 2.932 | -7.099 | 2.682 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 122.461 | -52.555 | 2.933 | -6.951 | 2.595 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 122.968 | -52.314 | 2.86 | -6.819 | 2.577 | 30.968 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 122.798 | -52.529 | 2.893 | -6.788 | 2.615 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 122.887 | -52.521 | 2.869 | -6.876 | 2.634 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 123.496 | -52.397 | â | -7.03 | 2.57 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.40 | 0.29 | â | 107 | 0.146 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.35 | 0.39 | â | 89 | â | 88 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.35 | 0.01 | â | 62 | -0.109 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.34 | 0.09 | â | 284 | 0.072 | 112* | 0.73 | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 0.40 | 0.34 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.25 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.34 | â | â | 91 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.35 | 0.39 | â | 89 | -0.109 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.35 | 0.01 | â | 89 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.35 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.35 | â | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.