UPK 468
0.61
UTI
0.29
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.38
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
8.2 [arcmin]
- CN 0.29 Poorly populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.38 Low quality
- Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 468 is a poorly populated, very dense object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 118.391 | -13.457 | 1.102 | -1.566 | 0.114 | -1.196 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 118.411 | -13.511 | 1.125 | -1.53 | 0.131 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 118.416 | -13.484 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 118.589 | -13.219 | 0.999 | -2.103 | 0.165 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 118.397 | -13.466 | 1.098 | -1.494 | 0.145 | -0.131 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 118.36 | -13.488 | 1.102 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 118.397 | -13.466 | 1.098 | -1.494 | 0.145 | -0.131 |
| He et al. | 2022 | 118.409 | -13.497 | 1.103 | -1.561 | 0.113 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 118.416 | -13.484 | 1.122 | -1.517 | 0.127 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 118.411 | -13.511 | 1.125 | -1.53 | 0.131 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 118.407 | -13.494 | 1.107 | -1.493 | 0.132 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 118.386 | -13.486 | â | -1.58 | 0.1 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.87 | 0.30 | â | 206 | -0.134 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.88 | 0.38 | â | 200 | â | 35 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.86 | 0.17 | â | 82 | -0.165 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 77* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.86 | 0.50 | â | 200 | -0.140 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.86 | 0.15 | 0.39 | 140 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.40 | â | 89 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.84 | â | â | 72 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.88 | 0.38 | â | 200 | -0.165 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.86 | 0.17 | â | 68 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.88 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.87 | â | â | 158 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.