UPK 457
0.55
UTI
0.29
CN
0.83
Cdens
0.62
CC3
0.5
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
9.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.29 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.83 Dense
- CC3 0.62 Intermediate quality
- Clit 0.5 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 457 is a poorly populated, dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 104.478 | -18.724 | 1.022 | -3.837 | 5.128 | 38.009 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 104.456 | -18.705 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 104.484 | -18.665 | 0.988 | -3.826 | 5.161 | 40.32 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 104.51 | -18.621 | 0.991 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 104.484 | -18.665 | 0.988 | -3.826 | 5.161 | 40.32 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 104.456 | -18.705 | 1.006 | -3.82 | 5.147 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 104.482 | -18.741 | 1.02 | -3.839 | 5.173 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 104.471 | -18.728 | 1.025 | -3.81 | 5.137 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 104.474 | -18.738 | â | -3.81 | 5.14 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.96 | 0.44 | â | 22 | â | 67 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 57* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.19 | 0.75 | â | 16 | -0.080 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.94 | 0.31 | 0.97 | 16 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.96 | 0.44 | â | 22 | 0.064 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.95 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.95 | â | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.