UPK 452

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.50 UTI
0.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.38
CC3
0.55
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 6.4 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.0 Sparse
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.38 Low quality
  • Clit 0.55 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
UPK 452 is a sparse, very dense object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as a moving group.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 110.254 -11.701 1.6 -5.785 3.185 45.866
Li et al. 2025 110.203 -11.712 1.567 -5.757 3.191 –
Almeida et al. 2025 110.137 -11.73 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 110.342 -11.641 1.566 -5.778 3.102 –
Cavallo et al. 2024 110.295 -11.636 1.607 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 110.366 -11.788 1.602 -5.813 3.264 41.311
Tarricq et al. 2022 108.089 -11.676 1.697 -5.631 2.977 –
Dias et al. 2021 110.137 -11.73 1.53 -5.74 3.181 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 110.203 -11.712 1.567 -5.757 3.191 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 110.203 -11.712 1.569 -5.775 3.152 –
Sim et al. 2019 110.231 -11.655 – -5.8 3.19 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 0.63 0.28 0.17 170 -0.073 64 – –
Li et al. 2025 0.65 0.14 – 75 0.262 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.63 0.41 – 186 – 64 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.64 0.28 – 134 -0.073 – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.52 0.39 – 389 -1.060 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.58 0.07 0.17 240 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.62 – – 170 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.63 0.41 – 186 -0.073 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.64 0.28 – 166 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.63 – – – – – – –
Sim et al. 2019 0.62 – – 40 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸