UPK 442

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.66 UTI
0.73
CN
0.39
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 38.1 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.73 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 0.39 Loose
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
UPK 442 is a moderately populated, loose object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as a moving group.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 98.163 -11.77 1.579 -2.575 -1.358 22.394
Li et al. 2025 98.4 -11.549 1.558 -2.58 -1.322 –
Almeida et al. 2025 98.601 -11.806 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 98.23 -12.045 1.536 -2.523 -1.381 –
Cavallo et al. 2024 98.203 -11.98 1.549 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 97.852 -12.557 1.539 -2.551 -1.34 20.99
Tarricq et al. 2022 98.026 -11.388 1.597 -2.561 -1.394 –
Dias et al. 2021 98.601 -11.806 1.512 -2.562 -1.315 26.227
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 98.4 -11.549 1.558 -2.58 -1.322 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 98.406 -11.705 1.516 -2.569 -1.294 –
Sim et al. 2019 98.484 -11.755 – -2.54 -1.32 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.66 0.34 – 82 -0.044 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.65 0.54 – 85 – 170 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.62 0.26 – 43 -0.152 – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.68 0.45 – 12 0.140 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.61 0.22 1.26 68 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.61 – – 178 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.65 0.54 – 85 -0.152 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.62 0.26 – 170 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.65 – – – – – – –
Sim et al. 2019 0.64 – – 50 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸