UPK 40

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.52 UTI
0.31
CN
0.26
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 25.4 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.31 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 0.26 Loose
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
UPK 40 is a poorly populated, loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as a moving group.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 292.62 -6.924 1.518 0.345 -9.093 -0.503
Li et al. 2025 292.631 -6.882 1.522 0.294 -9.12 –
Almeida et al. 2025 292.562 -6.614 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 292.76 -6.637 1.454 0.295 -9.17 –
Cavallo et al. 2024 292.422 -7.201 1.547 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 292.591 -7.201 1.539 0.336 -9.235 -0.66
Almeida et al. 2023 292.521 -6.642 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 292.828 -7.074 1.527 0.273 -9.075 –
Dias et al. 2021 292.562 -6.614 1.521 0.311 -9.129 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 292.631 -6.882 1.522 0.294 -9.12 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 292.634 -6.86 1.509 0.314 -9.108 –
Sim et al. 2019 292.637 -6.608 – 0.29 -9.13 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.59 1.02 – 514 -0.140 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.65 1.19 – 197 – 55 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.67 0.69 – 508 0.093 – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.63 0.94 – 178 0.560 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.63 1.08 0.38 166 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.64 1.13 – 476 -0.128 197* 0.75 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.65 – – 550 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.65 1.19 – 197 0.093 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.67 0.69 – 537 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.65 – – – – – – –
Sim et al. 2019 0.64 – – 562 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸