UPK 333
0.62
UTI
0.34
CN
0.51
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.75
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
17.6 [arcmin]
- CN 0.34 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.51 Moderately dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.75 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 333 is a poorly populated, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 61.794 | 44.112 | 1.401 | 2.483 | -6.453 | 15.056 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 61.771 | 44.094 | 1.348 | 2.491 | -6.466 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 61.867 | 44.144 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 62.187 | 44.098 | 1.347 | 2.223 | -6.134 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 61.69 | 44.189 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 61.69 | 44.189 | 1.4 | 2.511 | -6.431 | 14.508 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 61.84 | 44.175 | 1.405 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 61.69 | 44.189 | 1.4 | 2.511 | -6.431 | 14.508 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 61.862 | 44.138 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 61.867 | 44.144 | 1.336 | 2.479 | -6.467 | 24.288 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 61.771 | 44.094 | 1.348 | 2.491 | -6.466 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 61.806 | 44.103 | 1.361 | 2.511 | -6.445 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 61.804 | 44.195 | â | 2.53 | -6.47 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.64 | 0.97 | â | 745 | -0.141 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.72 | 1.24 | â | 553 | â | 97 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.71 | 0.74 | â | 705 | 0.051 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.104* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 72* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.68 | 0.95 | â | 407 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.68 | 1.17 | 0.93 | 254 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.61 | 1.28 | â | 684 | -0.168 | 175* | 0.54 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.70 | â | â | 776 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.72 | 1.24 | â | 553 | 0.051 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.71 | 0.74 | â | 759 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.72 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.72 | â | â | 631 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.