UPK 294
0.59
UTI
0.47
CN
0.23
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.75
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
29.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.47 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.23 Very loose
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.75 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UPK 294 is a poorly populated, very loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 60.971 | 65.949 | 1.332 | -1.265 | 2.263 | -15.666 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 60.902 | 66.176 | 1.304 | -1.259 | 2.316 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 60.768 | 66.04 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 60.783 | 66.072 | 1.304 | -1.302 | 2.179 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 61.895 | 65.492 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 61.896 | 65.492 | 1.336 | -1.273 | 2.224 | -18.781 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 60.818 | 65.962 | 1.336 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 61.896 | 65.492 | 1.336 | -1.273 | 2.224 | -18.781 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 60.682 | 66.095 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 60.768 | 66.04 | 1.305 | -1.254 | 2.257 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 60.902 | 66.176 | 1.304 | -1.259 | 2.316 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 60.971 | 66.072 | 1.309 | -1.268 | 2.304 | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 60.442 | 66.34 | â | -1.27 | 2.25 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.67 | 1.53 | â | 125 | 0.236 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.73 | 1.75 | â | 120 | â | 100 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.81 | 1.52 | â | 214 | 0.171 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.232* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 93* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.77 | 2.12 | â | 56 | 0.080 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.72 | 1.88 | 1.79 | 174 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.73 | 2.09 | â | 202 | -0.269 | 183* | 0.75 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.80 | â | â | 195 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.73 | 1.75 | â | 120 | 0.171 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.81 | 1.52 | â | 174 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.75 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Sim et al. | 2019 | 0.75 | â | â | 891 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.