UPK 155

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.50 UTI
0.31
CN
0.3
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 17.0 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.31 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 0.3 Loose
  • CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
UPK 155 is a poorly populated, loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 311.475 60.913 1.091 -2.217 -3.9 -19.354
Li et al. 2025 311.731 60.867 1.096 -2.255 -3.856 –
Almeida et al. 2025 311.719 60.796 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 311.322 60.643 1.078 -2.575 -3.918 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 311.237 60.748 1.09 -2.2 -3.877 -20.757
Cavallo et al. 2024 311.623 60.883 1.091 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 311.237 60.748 1.09 -2.2 -3.877 -20.757
Almeida et al. 2023 311.706 60.744 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 311.719 60.796 1.099 -2.268 -3.862 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 311.731 60.867 1.096 -2.255 -3.856 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 311.656 60.867 1.089 -2.293 -3.904 –
Sim et al. 2019 311.706 60.901 – -2.24 -3.86 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.83 1.00 – 201 -0.141 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.88 1.17 – 72 – 69 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.84 0.69 – 224 0.011 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 51* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.92 1.00 – 58 0.300 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.86 0.97 0.81 46 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.87 1.25 – 157 0.002 260* 0.66 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.82 – – 229 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.88 1.17 – 72 0.010 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.84 0.69 – 214 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.89 – – – – – – –
Sim et al. 2019 0.89 – – 35 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸