UFMG 47
0.69
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.35
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
20.2 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.35 Poorly studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UFMG 47 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 253.024 | -47.396 | 0.343 | 0.016 | -2.085 | -26.444 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 253.022 | -47.395 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 253.033 | -47.391 | 0.349 | 0.025 | -2.096 | -35.07 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 253.023 | -47.397 | 0.348 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 253.033 | -47.391 | 0.349 | 0.025 | -2.096 | -35.07 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 253.022 | -47.395 | 0.326 | -0.04 | -2.079 | â |
| Ferreira et al. | 2020 | 253.02 | -47.399 | 0.323 | -0.071 | -2.073 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.56 | 3.95 | 1.98 | 269 | 0.262 | 1002 | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.33 | 3.25 | â | 468 | â | 509 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1494(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.70 | 4.23 | â | 269 | 0.180 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.56 | 3.95 | 1.98 | 115 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.33 | 3.25 | â | 468 | 0.344 | â | â | â |
| Ferreira et al. | 2020 | 2.63 | 4.50 | â | 178 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.