UBC 664
0.47
UTI
0.29
CN
0.41
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.44
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
3.8 [arcmin]
- CN 0.29 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.41 Loose
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.44 Poorly studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UBC 664 is a poorly populated, loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 226.11 | -60.853 | 0.295 | -4.39 | -3.364 | -38.261 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 226.115 | -60.874 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 226.116 | -60.85 | 0.297 | -4.44 | -3.338 | -74.823 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 226.104 | -60.867 | 0.298 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 226.116 | -60.85 | 0.297 | -4.44 | -3.338 | -74.823 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 226.115 | -60.874 | 0.288 | -4.349 | -3.358 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 226.132 | -60.862 | 0.296 | -4.362 | -3.377 | â |
| Castro-Ginard et al. | 2020 | 226.125 | -60.868 | 0.296 | -4.353 | -3.377 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.27 | 2.02 | â | 11 | â | 430 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 563* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.24 | 2.24 | â | 15 | -0.330 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.92 | 2.09 | 2.45 | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.27 | 2.02 | â | 11 | 0.356 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.99 | 1.62 | â | 41 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.