UBC 651
0.47
UTI
0.44
CN
0.27
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.44
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
5.2 [arcmin]
- CN 0.44 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.27 Loose
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.44 Poorly studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UBC 651 is a poorly populated, loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.
Distant
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 148.398 | -55.735 | 0.266 | -5.069 | 2.726 | 23.762 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 148.378 | -55.747 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 148.424 | -55.741 | 0.272 | -5.065 | 2.747 | 23.714 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 148.367 | -55.725 | 0.273 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 148.424 | -55.741 | 0.272 | -5.065 | 2.747 | 23.714 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 148.378 | -55.747 | 0.241 | -5.013 | 2.748 | 10.501 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 148.412 | -55.756 | 0.244 | -5.02 | 2.724 | â |
| Castro-Ginard et al. | 2020 | 148.393 | -55.749 | 0.242 | -5.023 | 2.723 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.14 | 2.95 | â | 72 | â | 712 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 647* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.81 | 3.31 | â | 170 | 0.190 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.41 | 2.99 | 1.42 | 147 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.14 | 2.95 | â | 72 | 0.274 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.91 | 2.54 | â | 158 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.