UBC 439

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.38 UTI
0.43
CN
0.06
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.32
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 4.2 [pc], 0.3 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.43 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 0.06 Very loose
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.32 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
UBC 439 is a poorly populated, very loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 94.49 10.753 0.302 0.375 -0.965 34.231
Li et al. 2025 94.541 10.752 0.303 0.417 -0.944 –
Almeida et al. 2025 94.546 10.766 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 94.47 10.753 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 94.47 10.753 0.297 0.376 -0.963 34.242
Cavallo et al. 2024 94.543 10.724 0.3 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 94.47 10.753 0.297 0.376 -0.963 34.242
Almeida et al. 2023 94.544 10.761 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 94.541 10.752 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 94.546 10.766 0.282 0.443 -0.95 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 94.541 10.752 0.303 0.417 -0.944 –
Castro-Ginard et al. 2020 94.548 10.753 0.306 0.44 -0.945 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.77 1.325 0.82 280 -0.175 450 0.5 0
Li et al. 2025 2.76 1.26 – 323 -0.158 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.77 1.40 – 280 – 524 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.254(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 2.83 1.07 0.82 225 – 429(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.74 1.65 – 209 -0.380 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.83 1.07 0.82 225 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.57 1.39 – 287 -0.175 471(1) 0.50 –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 3.06 0.81 – 355 – 254 – 0(1)
Dias et al. 2021 2.77 1.40 – 280 -0.146 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 3.06 0.81 – 355 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 2.27 1.51 – 182 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸