UBC 382
0.63
UTI
0.43
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.35
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
11.3 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.43 Poorly populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.35 Poorly studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
UBC 382 is a poorly populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 325.01 | 49.308 | 0.433 | -3.47 | -4.908 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 325.001 | 49.305 | 0.424 | -3.47 | -4.863 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 324.987 | 49.312 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 324.985 | 49.319 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 324.987 | 49.312 | 0.434 | -3.458 | -4.842 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 325.001 | 49.305 | 0.424 | -3.47 | -4.863 | â |
| Castro-Ginard et al. | 2020 | 324.975 | 49.303 | 0.424 | -3.458 | -4.838 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.16 | 1.13 | â | 111 | -0.008 | 288 | 0.54 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.94 | 1.14 | â | 88 | -0.127 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.16 | 1.13 | â | 111 | â | 250 | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.12 | 1.23 | â | 219 | -0.008 | 325(1) | 0.54 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.16 | 1.13 | â | 111 | 0.173 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.30 | 0.82 | â | 219 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.