UBC 296
0.73
UTI
0.67
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.5
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
15.3 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.67 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.5 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
đĨ Members
đ Colab
đŦ Bayestar19
MOCA
đ CDS
đ Simbad
đ CDS (Îą, δ)
đ Simbad (Îą, δ)
MOCA
đ CDS
đ Simbad
đ CDS (Îą, δ)
đ Simbad (Îą, δ)
Overview
UBC 296 is a moderately populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 216.205 | -61.044 | 0.484 | -3.729 | -2.194 | -0.03 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 216.202 | -61.046 | 0.476 | -3.678 | -2.233 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 216.244 | -61.037 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 216.234 | -61.048 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 216.171 | -61.056 | 0.495 | -3.752 | -2.225 | -41.582 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 216.244 | -61.037 | 0.494 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 216.171 | -61.056 | 0.495 | -3.752 | -2.225 | -41.582 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 216.234 | -61.048 | 0.452 | -3.692 | -2.244 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 216.202 | -61.046 | 0.476 | -3.678 | -2.233 | â |
| Castro-Ginard et al. | 2020 | 216.245 | -61.045 | 0.478 | -3.686 | -2.24 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.925 | 1.4 | 0.87 | 174 | 0.149 | 422 | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.65 | 1.37 | â | 244 | -0.052 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.200(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.97 | 1.58 | â | 45 | â | 375 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 469(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.76 | 1.04 | â | 589 | 0.350 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.88 | 1.43 | 0.87 | 104 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.97 | 1.58 | â | 45 | 0.377 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.01 | 1.29 | â | 251 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.