Turner 9
(MWSC 3168)
0.90
UTI
0.74
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
6.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.74 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Turner 9 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a significant percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 296.182 | 29.501 | 0.565 | 0.313 | -2.431 | 0.976 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 296.165 | 29.494 | 0.563 | 0.346 | -2.399 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 296.185 | 29.513 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 296.127 | 29.514 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 296.182 | 29.498 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 296.182 | 29.498 | 0.548 | 0.316 | -2.457 | -19.644 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 296.185 | 29.513 | 0.548 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 296.182 | 29.498 | 0.548 | 0.316 | -2.457 | -19.644 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 296.127 | 29.514 | 0.559 | 0.347 | -2.398 | -12.753 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 296.165 | 29.494 | 0.563 | 0.346 | -2.399 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 296.165 | 29.494 | 0.563 | 0.346 | -2.399 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 296.165 | 29.494 | â | â | â | 1.57 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 296.165 | 29.494 | 0.563 | 0.346 | -2.399 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 296.2 | 29.258 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 296.204 | 29.265 | â | -1.62 | -4.35 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 296.205 | 29.26 | â | 0.63 | -3.6 | -18.5 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 296.204 | 29.265 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 296.193 | 29.258 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 296.2 | 29.26 | â | 0.8 | â | -18.52 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 296.193 | 29.258 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 296.2 | 29.26 | â | 0.63 | -3.6 | -13.86 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 296.204 | 29.265 | â | -1.62 | -4.35 | -18.52 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.57 | 0.49 | â | 589 | 0.155 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.100* | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.61 | 0.70 | â | 367 | â | 105 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.360* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 468* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.71 | 0.77 | â | 537 | 0.200 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.72 | 0.60 | 1.14 | 603 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.61 | 0.70 | â | 367 | 0.289 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.78 | 0.85 | â | 309 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.69 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.69 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.69 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.85 | 0.46 | â | 107 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.85 | 0.46 | â | 107 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.85 | â | â | 158 | â | 7413 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.85 | 0.46 | â | 115 | â | 9311* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.85 | 0.46 | â | 115 | â | 3491 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.85 | 0.46 | â | 115 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.85 | â | â | 158 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.