Turner 5
(MWSC 1684; OCSN 277)
0.51
UTI
0.3
CN
0.15
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.81
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Nm (P>50%)
30
Core radius and density
1.4 [pc], 0.8 [pc-2]
- CN 0.3 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.15 Very loose
- CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
- Clit 0.81 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Turner 5 is a poorly populated, very loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption, age, and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 143.15 | -36.349 | 2.369 | 0.013 | -2.992 | -4.353 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 143.284 | -36.358 | 2.373 | 0.092 | -3.115 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 143.451 | -36.41 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 143.651 | -36.372 | 2.372 | 0.146 | -3.033 | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 143.584 | -36.148 | 2.397 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 143.139 | -36.429 | 2.402 | 0.067 | -3.019 | -3.664 |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 143.36 | -36.41 | 2.4 | 0.07 | -3.0 | -4.34 |
| He et al. | 2022 | 143.582 | -36.425 | 2.403 | 0.161 | -3.034 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 142.5 | -36.249 | 2.376 | 0.001 | -2.962 | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 143.284 | -36.358 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 143.451 | -36.41 | 2.342 | 0.034 | -3.079 | -3.584 |
| Spina et al. | 2021 | 142.998 | -36.263 | 2.342 | 0.017 | -3.033 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 143.284 | -36.358 | 2.373 | 0.092 | -3.115 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 143.284 | -36.358 | 2.373 | 0.092 | -3.115 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 143.284 | -36.358 | â | â | â | -3.49 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 143.461 | -36.621 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 143.284 | -36.358 | 2.373 | 0.092 | -3.115 | â |
| Dib et al. | 2018 | 143.317 | -36.41 | â | â | â | â |
| Joshi et al. | 2016 | 143.317 | -36.41 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 143.463 | -36.615 | â | -4.69 | 2.04 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 143.463 | -36.615 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 143.127 | -36.462 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 143.46 | -36.62 | â | 1.65 | â | 26.2 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 143.127 | -36.462 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 143.13 | -36.47 | â | 0.0 | -3.73 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 143.463 | -36.615 | â | 0.0 | -3.73 | 26.2 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.425 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 309 | -0.074 | 1166 | â | 0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.43 | 0.14 | â | 431 | 0.041 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.43 | 0.23 | â | 367 | â | 36 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.43 | 0.04 | â | 507 | -0.074 | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.43 | 0.38 | â | 182 | 0.330 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.40 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 164 | â | â | â | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 0.49 | 0.35 | â | 282 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.50 | â | 112 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.43 | â | â | 331 | â | â | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 0.43 | 0.04 | â | 324 | â | 49 | â | 0(1) |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.43 | 0.23 | â | 367 | -0.075 | â | â | â |
| Spina et al. | 2021 | 0.43 | â | â | 324 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.43 | 0.04 | â | 324 | â | â | â | â |
| Kounkel et al. | 2020 | 0.40 | 0.26 | â | 407 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dib et al. | 2018 | 0.40 | â | â | 309 | â | â | â | â |
| Joshi et al. | 2016 | 0.40 | 0.32 | â | 309 | â | 4074 | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.30 | â | â | 309 | â | 4074 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.40 | 0.32 | â | 309 | â | 1542(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.40 | 0.32 | â | 309 | â | 789 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.40 | 0.32 | â | 309 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.40 | 0.32 | â | 309 | -0.210 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Palma et al. (2025)
Classified as optical pair (not dynamically associated) P140, along with HSC_2120.
Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as moving group. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).
Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).
Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.5954, e_all=0.1683.