Turner 2

(MWSC 2872)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.20 UTI
0.0
CN
0.06
Cdens
0.25
CC3
0.35
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 1.7 [pc], 0.3 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.0 Sparse
  • Cdens 0.06 Very loose
  • CC3 0.25 Low quality
  • Clit 0.35 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Turner 2 is a sparse, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a young cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~3.01 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.24 kpc).

âš ī¸ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (Cdup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Bica et al. (2019)
Asterisms and cluster alikes by B. Alessi reported in DAML02.

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'OC2' (totally exposed cluster without correlation with ATLASGAL emission). Morphological flag: exposed cluster, without submm emission.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 274.245 -18.971 0.333 -1.653 -2.715 -7.19
Just et al. 2023 274.221 -19.066 – – – –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – -0.19 -1.96 –
Dib et al. 2018 274.23 -19.065 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 274.335 -18.842 – 3.172 -2.662 -15.7
Sampedro et al. 2017 274.296 -18.824 – 1.06 -0.99 –
Joshi et al. 2016 274.23 -19.065 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 274.221 -19.066 – – – –
Tadross 2014 274.296 -18.824 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 274.296 -18.824 – 1.25 -0.77 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 274.23 -19.065 – 2.8 1.1 -15.7
Morales et al. 2013 274.296 -18.824 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 274.296 -18.824 – 1.25 -0.77 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.24 1.44 – 79 – 151 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 79 – 151 – –
Dib et al. 2018 1.29 – – 79 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.88 1.56 – 4 – – – –
Joshi et al. 2016 1.29 1.44 – 79 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.29 1.44 – 79 – – – –
Tadross 2014 1.19 1.14 – 100 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.29 1.44 – 79 – – – –
Morales et al. 2013 1.19 – – 100 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.19 1.14 – 100 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸