Trumpler 7
(Collinder 146; MWSC 1229; OCL 635; ESO 492 16; FSR 1288; FoF 51)
0.91
UTI
0.82
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
5.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.82 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Trumpler 7 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 111.848 | -23.952 | 0.576 | -2.472 | 3.362 | 28.547 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 111.849 | -23.949 | 0.554 | -2.484 | 3.329 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 111.851 | -23.951 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 111.844 | -23.951 | 0.577 | -2.474 | 3.361 | 12.507 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 111.846 | -23.961 | 0.578 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 111.844 | -23.951 | 0.577 | -2.474 | 3.361 | 12.507 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 111.82 | -23.958 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 111.845 | -23.947 | 0.596 | -2.485 | 3.342 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 111.849 | -23.949 | 0.554 | -2.484 | 3.329 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 111.851 | -23.951 | 0.557 | -2.501 | 3.322 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 111.849 | -23.949 | 0.554 | -2.484 | 3.329 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 111.849 | -23.949 | 0.554 | -2.484 | 3.329 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 111.844 | -23.945 | 0.563 | -2.474 | 3.332 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 111.849 | -23.949 | â | â | â | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 111.841 | -23.946 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 111.849 | -23.949 | 0.554 | -2.484 | 3.329 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 111.84 | -23.95 | â | -3.512 | 2.873 | 32.9 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 111.82 | -23.958 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 111.842 | -23.95 | â | -2.99 | 2.64 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 111.825 | -23.96 | â | -4.1 | 4.19 | 32.9 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 111.842 | -23.95 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 111.832 | -23.951 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 111.84 | -23.95 | â | 0.15 | â | 32.87 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 111.838 | -23.957 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 111.84 | -23.95 | â | -2.26 | 3.07 | 32.87 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 111.82 | -23.93 | â | 1.87 | -1.07 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 111.842 | -23.95 | â | -2.99 | 2.64 | 32.87 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 111.842 | -23.95 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.62 | 1.05 | â | 64 | -0.071 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.55 | 1.03 | â | 153 | â | 413 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 838* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.65 | 0.74 | â | 240 | 0.300 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.60 | 0.77 | 1.27 | 113 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 100 | â | 214 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.70* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.71 | 0.84 | â | 49 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.55 | 1.03 | â | 153 | -0.100 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.71 | 0.78 | â | 66 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.71 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 32 | -0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.72 | 0.84 | â | 49 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.71 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.50 | 0.80 | â | 30 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.66 | 0.97 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.66 | 0.97 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.47 | â | â | 27 | â | 282 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.47 | 0.84 | â | 52 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.47 | 0.84 | â | 27 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.47 | 0.84 | â | 52 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.47 | 0.84 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.47 | 0.82 | â | 27 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.35 | 0.86 | â | 11 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.