Trumpler 5
(Collinder 105; MWSC 933; OCL 494; FSR 0989; FoF 369)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
N50 (P>50% members)
4578
Radius (P>50% members)
7.8 [arcmin]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Trumpler 5 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as an extremely massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 99.125 | 9.468 | 0.302 | -0.612 | 0.267 | 50.75 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 99.126 | 9.465 | 0.284 | -0.59 | 0.273 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 99.126 | 9.472 | â | â | â | â |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 99.36 | 9.427 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 99.128 | 9.46 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 99.127 | 9.459 | 0.302 | -0.618 | 0.269 | 51.318 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 99.126 | 9.472 | 0.301 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 99.127 | 9.459 | 0.302 | -0.618 | 0.269 | 51.318 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 99.112 | 9.472 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 99.129 | 9.472 | 0.312 | -0.606 | 0.29 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 99.126 | 9.465 | 0.284 | -0.59 | 0.273 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 99.128 | 9.46 | 0.283 | -0.586 | 0.285 | 51.472 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 99.126 | 9.465 | 0.284 | -0.59 | 0.273 | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | 99.12 | 9.47 | â | -0.58 | 0.23 | 50.5 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 99.126 | 9.465 | 0.284 | -0.59 | 0.273 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 99.127 | 9.475 | 0.317 | -0.544 | 0.248 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 99.126 | 9.465 | â | â | â | 51.33 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 99.119 | 9.455 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 99.126 | 9.465 | 0.284 | -0.59 | 0.273 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 99.18 | 9.434 | â | -0.127 | -0.371 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 99.112 | 9.472 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 99.175 | 9.433 | â | 0.77 | 0.59 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 99.12 | 9.47 | â | -0.24 | -0.37 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 99.175 | 9.433 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 99.175 | 9.433 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 99.175 | 9.433 | â | 0.77 | 0.59 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 3.12 | 1.94 | 2.17 | 3459 | -0.336 | 24555 | â | 0.09 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 3.04 | 2.05 | â | 3752 | -0.441 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.230(5) | â | â | â |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 3.26 | 2.02 | â | 3459 | -0.400 | â | â | 0.09(1) |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.26 | 2.02 | â | 3459 | â | 26209 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 24555(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.94 | 1.79 | â | 3311 | -0.080 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.96 | 1.71 | 2.17 | 2173 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 3162 | â | 2844 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 3.22(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 3.19 | 1.92 | â | 3981 | â | â | â | 103 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.26 | 2.02 | â | 3459 | -0.372 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.05 | 1.20 | â | 4266 | â | â | â | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | â | â | â | â | -0.440 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.19 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 1660 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 3.19 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.19 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 4.66 | 2.33 | â | 1698 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.75 | 1.94 | â | 3162 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.75 | 1.94 | â | 3162 | -0.300 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.40 | â | â | 5012 | -0.300 | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 3.00 | 1.80 | â | 4074 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.82 | 1.92 | â | 3981 | -0.403 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.