Trumpler 29
(Collinder 343; MWSC 2663; Harvard 17; OCL 1009; ESO 334 04; FoF 2211)
0.96
UTI
0.79
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
6.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.79 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Trumpler 29 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 265.35 | -40.15 | 0.683 | 0.458 | -2.345 | -26.75 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 265.347 | -40.158 | 0.673 | 0.489 | -2.308 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 265.359 | -40.169 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 265.355 | -40.147 | 0.683 | 0.448 | -2.347 | -34.763 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 265.337 | -40.159 | 0.683 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 265.355 | -40.147 | 0.683 | 0.448 | -2.347 | -34.763 |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 265.359 | -40.169 | 0.673 | 0.478 | -2.315 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 265.363 | -40.12 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 265.345 | -40.108 | 0.668 | 0.447 | -2.358 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 265.359 | -40.169 | 0.673 | 0.478 | -2.315 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 265.347 | -40.158 | 0.673 | 0.489 | -2.308 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 265.347 | -40.158 | 0.673 | 0.489 | -2.308 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 265.324 | -40.149 | 0.665 | 0.471 | -2.288 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 265.347 | -40.158 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 265.347 | -40.158 | â | â | â | -23.99 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 265.373 | -40.167 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 265.347 | -40.158 | 0.673 | 0.489 | -2.308 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 265.363 | -40.12 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 265.379 | -40.15 | â | -0.24 | -5.02 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 265.372 | -40.12 | â | 0.6 | -3.84 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 265.369 | -40.153 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 265.38 | -40.15 | â | 1.45 | -4.64 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 265.38 | -40.15 | â | 3.45 | -3.26 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.46 | 0.76 | â | 67 | 0.259 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.35 | 0.93 | â | 53 | â | 440 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 849* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.31 | 1.10 | â | 81 | -0.160 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.38 | 0.70 | 0.90 | 133 | â | â | â | â |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 1.35 | 0.93 | â | 53 | 0.192 | 5125 | 0.37 | 0.00 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 484 | â | 53 | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.45 | â | â | 52 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.35 | 0.93 | â | 53 | 0.192 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.49 | 0.72 | â | 51 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 62 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.36 | 0.75 | â | 58 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.10 | 0.00 | â | 484 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.10 | 0.00 | â | 484 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.76 | 0.59 | â | 490 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.76 | 0.59 | â | 490 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.50 | 0.16 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.