Trumpler 19
(Collinder 243; MWSC 1924; OCL 843; ESO 169 07; FSR 1565)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
5.9 [arcmin]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Trumpler 19 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Old
Contains BSS
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 168.616 | -57.565 | 0.394 | -1.671 | -1.216 | -26.876 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 168.623 | -57.563 | 0.374 | -1.675 | -1.237 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 168.627 | -57.567 | â | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 168.639 | -57.561 | 0.391 | -1.668 | -1.219 | â |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 168.799 | -57.679 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 168.619 | -57.56 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 168.625 | -57.564 | 0.397 | -1.661 | -1.217 | -27.974 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 168.627 | -57.567 | 0.396 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 168.625 | -57.564 | 0.397 | -1.661 | -1.217 | -27.974 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 168.61 | -57.574 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 168.555 | -57.531 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 168.619 | -57.56 | 0.372 | -1.674 | -1.228 | -26.414 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 168.623 | -57.563 | 0.374 | -1.675 | -1.237 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 168.623 | -57.563 | 0.374 | -1.675 | -1.237 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 168.623 | -57.563 | â | â | â | -26.38 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 168.602 | -57.549 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 168.623 | -57.563 | 0.374 | -1.675 | -1.237 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 168.555 | -57.531 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 168.583 | -57.551 | â | -4.34 | 0.71 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 168.562 | -57.535 | â | -13.35 | 3.93 | â |
| Glushkova et al. | 2010 | 168.584 | -57.551 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 168.583 | -57.551 | â | -4.49 | 0.62 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.40 | 0.76 | â | 3749 | -0.157 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.270* | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 2.28 | 0.71 | â | 3802 | 0.000 | 5409 | 0.64 | â |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 2.34 | 0.63 | â | 4130 | 0.000 | â | â | 0.12* |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.34 | 0.63 | â | 4130 | â | 3147 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 3452* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.21 | 0.69 | â | 3467 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.36 | 0.43 | 0.88 | 2193 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.36 | 0.63 | â | 3890 | 0.039 | 2684* | 0.66 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 4467 | â | 406 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.34 | 0.63 | â | 4130 | -0.015 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.51 | 0.37 | â | 4898 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.48 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.48 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.48 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.97 | 0.29 | â | 4467 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.97 | 0.29 | â | 4467 | â | â | â | â |
| Glushkova et al. | 2010 | 1.90 | 0.25 | â | 4467 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.90 | 0.25 | â | 4467 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.