Trumpler 18
(MWSC 1911; FoF 1526)
0.90
UTI
0.77
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
5.0 [arcmin]
- CN 0.77 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Trumpler 18 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 167.83 | -60.637 | 0.65 | -7.147 | 0.609 | -8.602 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 167.826 | -60.656 | 0.624 | -7.172 | 0.569 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 167.858 | -60.644 | 0.657 | -7.159 | 0.621 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 167.832 | -60.652 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 167.826 | -60.63 | 0.654 | -7.138 | 0.623 | 40.181 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 167.844 | -60.655 | 0.655 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 167.826 | -60.63 | 0.654 | -7.138 | 0.623 | 40.181 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 167.888 | -60.661 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 167.833 | -60.657 | 0.664 | -7.137 | 0.612 | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 167.827 | -60.655 | 0.663 | -7.161 | 0.567 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 167.826 | -60.656 | 0.624 | -7.172 | 0.569 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 167.832 | -60.652 | 0.622 | -7.165 | 0.571 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 167.826 | -60.656 | 0.624 | -7.172 | 0.569 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 167.826 | -60.656 | 0.624 | -7.172 | 0.569 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 167.803 | -60.639 | 0.63 | -7.146 | 0.561 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 167.867 | -60.667 | 0.633 | -7.168 | 0.583 | -4.6 |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 167.826 | -60.656 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 167.826 | -60.656 | 0.624 | -7.172 | 0.569 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 167.865 | -60.667 | â | -7.22 | 2.13 | -17.4 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 167.888 | -60.661 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 167.867 | -60.667 | â | -4.07 | -0.88 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 167.895 | -60.665 | â | -8.9 | 0.6 | -17.4 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 167.867 | -60.667 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 167.877 | -60.664 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 167.86 | -60.67 | â | 0.16 | â | -20.0 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 167.875 | -60.667 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 167.88 | -60.67 | â | -9.13 | 0.52 | -20.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 167.88 | -60.67 | â | -9.12 | 0.07 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 167.867 | -60.667 | â | -4.07 | -0.88 | -20.0 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 167.867 | -60.667 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.39 | 0.89 | â | 71 | -0.053 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 2.13 | 1.33 | â | 35 | -0.250 | 439 | 0.34 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.49 | 0.90 | â | 86 | â | 181 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 951* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.40 | 0.94 | â | 91 | -0.010 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.45 | 0.69 | 0.96 | 102 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 49 | â | 122 | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.46 | â | â | 58 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.50* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.53 | 0.96 | â | 15 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.49 | 0.90 | â | 86 | 0.155 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.52 | 0.76 | â | 48 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.53 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 34 | -0.250 | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 1.55 | 0.71 | â | 48 | 0.112 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.65 | 0.91 | â | 46 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.53 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.36 | 0.97 | â | 16 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.42 | 0.82 | â | 49 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.42 | 0.82 | â | 49 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.36 | â | â | 16 | â | 209 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.36 | 0.96 | â | 59 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.36 | 0.99 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.36 | 0.96 | â | 59 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.36 | 0.99 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.36 | 0.98 | â | 16 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 2.00 | 1.11 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.