Tombaugh 5
(MWSC 306; OCL 385; FSR 0641; FoF 612)
0.95
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
10.0 [arcmin]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Tombaugh 5 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | β | 56.975 | 59.066 | 0.572 | 0.455 | -2.449 | -24.313 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 56.984 | 59.07 | 0.561 | 0.515 | -2.388 | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 56.986 | 59.059 | β | β | β | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 56.974 | 59.076 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 56.974 | 59.076 | 0.576 | 0.456 | -2.459 | -24.859 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 56.982 | 59.062 | 0.577 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 56.974 | 59.076 | 0.576 | 0.456 | -2.459 | -24.859 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 56.977 | 59.039 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 57.003 | 59.069 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 56.986 | 59.059 | 0.562 | 0.523 | -2.391 | -23.107 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 56.984 | 59.07 | 0.561 | 0.515 | -2.388 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 56.95 | 59.05 | β | 0.453 | -2.401 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 56.984 | 59.07 | 0.561 | 0.515 | -2.388 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 56.986 | 59.061 | 0.562 | 0.533 | -2.383 | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 56.984 | 59.07 | β | β | β | -23.1 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 57.004 | 59.089 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 56.984 | 59.07 | 0.561 | 0.515 | -2.388 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 56.955 | 59.07 | β | 0.544 | -1.267 | -5.8 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 57.003 | 59.069 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 56.95 | 59.05 | β | -0.72 | -1.75 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 57.015 | 59.07 | β | 1.2 | -1.42 | -5.8 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 56.95 | 59.05 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 57.015 | 59.07 | β | 1.2 | -1.42 | -5.8 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 56.944 | 59.049 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 56.95 | 59.05 | β | 0.18 | β | -5.8 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 56.95 | 59.05 | β | -0.39 | -2.64 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 56.95 | 59.06 | β | 0.26 | -3.04 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 56.95 | 59.05 | β | -0.72 | -1.75 | -5.8 |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.39 | 2.33 | β | 469 | -0.039 | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.53 | 2.41 | β | 178 | β | 2189 | β | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | β | β | β | β | -0.040* | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 4363* | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.87 | 2.59 | β | 145 | 0.640 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.63 | 2.62 | 1.78 | 149 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.54 | 2.50 | β | 225 | 0.020 | 1544* | 0.69 | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 701 | β | 260 | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.53 | 2.41 | β | 178 | 0.189 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.71 | 2.07 | β | 186 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.70 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 174 | 0.250 | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.70 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.70 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.26 | 2.39 | β | 166 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.35 | 1.71 | β | 701 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.35 | 1.71 | β | 701 | β | β | β | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.75 | β | β | 200 | β | 162 | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 1.35 | 1.71 | β | 701 | β | β | β | β |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.00 | 0.78 | β | 537 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.00 | 0.78 | β | 537 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.80 | 0.78 | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.75 | 2.48 | β | 200 | β | β | β | β |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.