Tombaugh 4

(MWSC 199; OCL 349; FSR 0585)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.96 UTI
0.8
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 1.8 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.8 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Tombaugh 4 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Distant High extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 37.298 61.788 0.295 -1.059 -0.207 -42.478
Hu & Soubiran 2025 37.317 61.791 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 37.333 61.78 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 37.294 61.79 0.3 -1.066 -0.224 -43.66
Cavallo et al. 2024 37.317 61.791 0.297 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 37.294 61.79 0.3 -1.066 -0.224 -43.66
Just et al. 2023 37.277 61.783 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 37.333 61.78 0.255 -1.035 -0.144 -74.103
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 37.305 61.787 0.275 -1.057 -0.163 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 37.305 61.787 0.275 -1.057 -0.163 –
Bica et al. 2019 37.288 61.783 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 37.305 61.787 0.275 -1.057 -0.163 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 37.29 61.784 – 0.184 -3.132 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 37.277 61.783 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 37.225 61.783 – 2.05 -5.23 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 37.29 61.785 – 0.91 -2.72 –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 37.29 61.785 – 0.91 -2.72 –
Dias et al. 2002 37.225 61.783 – 2.05 -5.23 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.490* – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 3.01 3.36 – 841 – 1296 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 2390* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.72 3.70 – 912 -0.110 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.96 3.54 2.29 682 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 437 – 532 – –
Dias et al. 2021 3.01 3.36 – 841 -0.475 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 3.58 2.69 – 1585 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 3.29 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 3.29 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.95 3.62 – 417 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 3.70 3.87 – 437 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 3.70 3.87 – 437 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 3.70 3.87 – 437 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 3.85 3.88 – 501 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸