Tombaugh 1
(Haffner 1; MWSC 1060; OCL 603; ESO 558 04; FSR 1246; FoF 18)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
26.7 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Tombaugh 1 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 105.126 | -20.576 | 0.388 | -2.556 | 3.843 | 81.931 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 105.126 | -20.569 | 0.371 | -2.564 | 3.833 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 105.125 | -20.588 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 105.131 | -20.576 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 105.122 | -20.576 | 0.394 | -2.56 | 3.837 | 82.139 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 105.125 | -20.588 | 0.394 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 105.122 | -20.576 | 0.394 | -2.56 | 3.837 | 82.139 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 105.129 | -20.578 | â | â | â | â |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 105.131 | -20.576 | 0.371 | -2.574 | 3.83 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 105.119 | -20.563 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 105.122 | -20.578 | 0.403 | -2.569 | 3.831 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 105.126 | -20.569 | 0.371 | -2.564 | 3.833 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 105.131 | -20.576 | 0.371 | -2.574 | 3.83 | 82.397 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 105.126 | -20.569 | 0.371 | -2.564 | 3.833 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 105.126 | -20.569 | 0.371 | -2.564 | 3.833 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 105.121 | -20.584 | 0.368 | -2.565 | 3.808 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 105.126 | -20.569 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 105.126 | -20.569 | â | â | â | 82.77 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 105.123 | -20.561 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 105.126 | -20.569 | 0.371 | -2.564 | 3.833 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 105.12 | -20.567 | â | -0.4 | 0.901 | 81.1 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 105.119 | -20.563 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 105.121 | -20.567 | â | -5.31 | 5.17 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 105.124 | -20.565 | â | -0.99 | 3.97 | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 105.121 | -20.567 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 105.121 | -20.567 | â | -5.31 | 5.17 | 81.1 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.5 | 0.87 | 1.09 | 1161 | -0.107 | 989 | 0.525 | 0.01 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.76 | 0.84 | â | 1078 | 0.039 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.260(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.25 | 0.91 | â | 1279 | â | 989 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 2445(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.32 | 0.71 | â | 1380 | 0.110 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.30 | 0.40 | 1.09 | 1253 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.37 | 0.87 | â | 1321 | -0.095 | 810(1) | 0.51 | â |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 2.26 | 0.91 | â | 1279 | -0.119 | 1075 | 0.54 | 0.01 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1161 | â | 726 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.48(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.50 | 0.93 | â | 955 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.25 | 0.91 | â | 1279 | -0.119 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.56 | 0.66 | â | 1259 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.50 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 1450 | -0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 2.74 | 0.79 | â | 979 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.50 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.50 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 4.76 | 1.15 | â | 724 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.64 | 0.87 | â | 1161 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.64 | 0.87 | â | 1161 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 3.00 | 1.24 | â | 1000 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 4.17 | 0.94 | â | 955 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.