Teutsch 52

(MWSC 561; DSH J0530.3+3813)

0.57 UTI

0.31

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.12

C_C3

0.7

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification DC

Number of members (P>50%) 31

Radius (P>50% members) 1.1 [arcmin]

C_N 0.31 Poorly populated
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.12 Very low quality
C_lit 0.7 Moderately studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Teutsch 52 is a poorly populated, very dense object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large^* distance, above the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as an intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~6.68 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~4.20 kpc).

Distant High extinction Intermediate age

Data

🔍 Search references for Teutsch 52 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	82.575	38.228	0.15	-0.022	-0.351	–
Just et al.	2023	82.549	38.208	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	82.575	38.244	0.158	0.059	-0.136	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	82.575	38.231	–	0.266	-0.41	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	82.575	38.244	0.158	0.059	-0.136	–
Bica et al.	2019	82.572	38.231	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	82.575	38.244	0.158	0.059	-0.136	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	82.549	38.208	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	82.575	38.231	–	-0.89	-2.25	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	82.56	38.207	–	-1.85	-2.71	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	82.56	38.207	–	-1.85	-2.71	–
Kronberger et al.	2006	82.576	38.231	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	82.575	38.231	–	-0.9	-2.27	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	631	–	164	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	5.34	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	5.34	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	4.20	3.35	–	631	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	4.20	3.35	–	631	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	4.20	3.35	–	631	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	3.24	3.78	–	501	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2