Teutsch 42

(MCM 23; MCM2005b 23; MWSC 3132)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.46 UTI
0.48
CN
0.43
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.32
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 1.6 [pc], 2.1 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.48 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 0.43 Loose
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.32 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Teutsch 42 is a poorly populated, loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by very high extinction. It is catalogued as a very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~6.44 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~3.08 kpc).

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'OC1' (totally exposed cluster still physically associated with gas). Morphological flag: exposed cluster, without submm emission.

Mercer et al. (2005)
Association of stars. Detected using no magnitude cut. Detected in 2MASS catalog with our algorithm. Appears in 2MASS images.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 292.553 18.537 0.155 -3.105 -5.884 –
Celli et al. 2024 292.555 18.536 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 292.548 18.531 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 292.554 18.535 0.182 -3.116 -5.83 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 292.554 18.535 0.182 -3.116 -5.83 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 292.554 18.535 0.182 -3.116 -5.83 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 292.548 18.531 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 292.554 18.533 – -2.59 -6.94 –
Morales et al. 2013 292.555 18.537 – – – –
Kronberger et al. 2006 292.555 18.536 – – – –
Mercer et al. 2005 292.555 18.538 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 292.554 18.536 – -1.96 -5.06 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 3.08 8.04 – 2 – 246 – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 1 – 480 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 1 – 13 – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 4.16 7.76 – 2 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 4.73 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 4.73 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.00 8.74 – 1 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.00 8.74 – 1 – – – –
Morales et al. 2013 6.66 – – 3 – – – –
Kronberger et al. 2006 1.60 8.04 – 32 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.60 8.04 – 32 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸