Teutsch 42

(MCM 23; MCM2005b 23; MWSC 3132)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.57 UTI
0.48
CN
0.4
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 2.0 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.48 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 0.4 Loose
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Teutsch 42 is a poorly populated, loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by very high extinction. It is catalogued as a very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~6.44 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~2.00 kpc).

Mercer et al. (2005)
Association of stars. Detected using no magnitude cut. Detected in 2MASS catalog with our algorithm. Appears in 2MASS images.

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'OC1' (totally exposed cluster still physically associated with gas). Morphological flag: exposed cluster, without submm emission.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 292.553 18.537 0.155 -3.105 -5.884 –
Celli et al. 2024 292.555 18.536 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 292.548 18.531 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 292.554 18.535 0.182 -3.116 -5.83 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 292.554 18.535 0.182 -3.116 -5.83 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 292.554 18.535 0.182 -3.116 -5.83 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 292.548 18.531 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 292.554 18.533 – -2.59 -6.94 –
Morales et al. 2013 292.555 18.537 – – – –
Kronberger et al. 2006 292.555 18.536 – – – –
Mercer et al. 2005 292.555 18.538 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 292.554 18.536 – -1.96 -5.06 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.0 8.24 – 1 – 246 – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 1 – 480 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 1 – 13 – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 4.73 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 4.73 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.00 8.58 – 1 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.00 8.58 – 1 – – – –
Morales et al. 2013 6.66 – – 3 – – – –
Kronberger et al. 2006 1.60 7.90 – 32 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.60 7.90 – 32 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸