Teutsch 38
(ASCC 49; MWSC 1569)
0.96
UTI
0.81
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
6.5 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.81 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Teutsch 38 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 131.498 | -38.002 | 1.512 | -8.546 | 3.663 | 26.445 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 131.523 | -38.025 | 1.502 | -8.636 | 3.669 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 131.52 | -38.087 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 131.549 | -38.003 | 1.494 | -8.54 | 3.717 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 131.745 | -37.854 | 1.496 | -8.479 | 3.657 | 24.614 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 131.486 | -37.948 | 1.518 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 131.745 | -37.854 | 1.496 | -8.479 | 3.657 | 24.614 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 131.504 | -38.009 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 131.957 | -37.997 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 131.588 | -37.925 | 1.513 | -8.509 | 3.669 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 131.52 | -38.087 | 1.501 | -8.655 | 3.692 | 25.305 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 131.523 | -38.025 | 1.502 | -8.636 | 3.669 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 131.523 | -38.025 | 1.502 | -8.636 | 3.669 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 131.523 | -38.025 | â | â | â | 28.09 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 131.99 | -38.061 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 131.523 | -38.025 | 1.502 | -8.636 | 3.669 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 131.985 | -38.057 | â | -1.62 | 0.48 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 131.957 | -37.997 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 131.992 | -38.058 | â | -1.62 | 0.48 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 131.962 | -38.0 | â | -7.0 | 3.4 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 131.964 | -37.987 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 131.97 | -37.99 | â | -7.47 | 3.34 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 131.992 | -38.058 | â | -1.62 | 0.48 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.65 | 0.07 | 0.7 | 57 | -0.004 | 172 | 0.81 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.61 | 0.22 | â | 34 | -0.050 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.65 | 0.22 | â | 44 | â | 236 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.67 | 0.01 | â | 26 | 0.115 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 107(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.69 | 0.49 | â | 12 | -0.230 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.70 | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.64 | 0.26 | â | 70 | -0.004 | 296(1) | 0.81 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 79 | â | 39 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.20 | â | 28 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.65 | 0.22 | â | 44 | 0.115 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.67 | 0.01 | â | 37 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.56 | 0.06 | â | 138 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.63 | 0.07 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.63 | 0.07 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.90 | 0.06 | â | 138 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.90 | 0.06 | â | 138 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.90 | 0.06 | â | 138 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.