Teutsch 35
(ASCC 103; MWSC 3141; Teutsch J1935.9+3540; FoF 2426; OCSN 275)
0.97
UTI
0.83
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
15.7 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.83 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Teutsch 35 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 294.079 | 35.742 | 2.008 | -0.649 | -2.471 | -6.956 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 294.091 | 35.742 | 2.007 | -0.683 | -2.439 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 294.109 | 35.751 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 294.087 | 35.745 | 1.976 | -0.639 | -2.461 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 294.084 | 35.708 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 294.084 | 35.708 | 2.0 | -0.63 | -2.477 | -6.984 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 294.177 | 35.842 | 2.013 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 294.084 | 35.708 | 2.0 | -0.63 | -2.477 | -6.984 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 294.207 | 35.69 | â | â | â | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 294.14 | 35.74 | 2.02 | -0.63 | -2.47 | -7.5 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 294.07 | 35.658 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 294.142 | 35.747 | 2.011 | -0.65 | -2.456 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 294.031 | 35.735 | 2.006 | -0.632 | -2.458 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 294.109 | 35.751 | 2.007 | -0.653 | -2.419 | -9.391 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 294.091 | 35.742 | 2.007 | -0.683 | -2.439 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 294.091 | 35.742 | 2.007 | -0.683 | -2.439 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 294.09 | 35.764 | 2.007 | -0.682 | -2.463 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 294.091 | 35.742 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 294.091 | 35.742 | â | â | â | -7.66 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 293.985 | 35.67 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 294.091 | 35.742 | 2.007 | -0.683 | -2.439 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 293.985 | 35.668 | â | -1.96 | -2.57 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 294.07 | 35.658 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 293.983 | 35.668 | â | -1.96 | -2.57 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 294.075 | 35.66 | â | -0.83 | -1.97 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 294.04 | 35.668 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 294.04 | 35.67 | â | -1.35 | -2.3 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 293.983 | 35.668 | â | -1.96 | -2.57 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.505 | 0.01 | 0.73 | 178 | 0.084 | 222 | 0.63 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.50 | 0.01 | â | 263 | 0.264 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.49 | 0.14 | â | 231 | â | 250 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.51 | 0.00 | â | 82 | 0.079 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | 0.089(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 295(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.51 | 0.47 | â | 83 | 0.220 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.48 | 0.14 | 0.73 | 126 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.49 | 0.03 | â | 100 | -0.010 | 193(1) | 0.63 | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 0.55 | 0.31 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 245 | â | 115 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.25 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.50 | â | â | 105 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.49 | 0.14 | â | 231 | 0.078 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.51 | 0.00 | â | 102 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.49 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 33 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.47 | 0.00 | â | 79 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.49 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.49 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.92 | 2.67 | â | 506 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.84 | 0.00 | â | 245 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.84 | 0.00 | â | 245 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.70 | 0.00 | â | 234 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.70 | 0.00 | â | 234 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.70 | 0.00 | â | 234 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.