Teutsch 11

(MWSC 863; DSH J0625.4+1351)

0.42 UTI

0.48

C_N

0.45

C_dens

0.25

C_C3

0.45

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 48

Core radius and density 1.5 [pc], 2.2 [pc^-2]

C3 classification DB

C_N 0.48 Poorly populated
C_dens 0.45 Loose
C_C3 0.25 Low quality
C_lit 0.45 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Teutsch 11 is a poorly populated, loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Distant Moderate extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age Contains BSS

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.1267, e_all=0.0952.

Piecka & Paunzen (2021)
Belongs to cluster aggregate 'Agg57' along with Teutsch 12.

Bica et al. (2019)
The Preliminary Amateur Open Cluster Catalog, Version 08/03/2003.

Data

🔍 Search references for Teutsch 11 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	96.347	13.879	0.183	0.317	-0.563	–
Just et al.	2023	96.338	13.869	–	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	96.352	13.878	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	96.352	13.878	0.176	0.382	-0.619	–
Zhong et al.	2020	96.352	13.878	–	0.382	-0.619	-23.215
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	96.352	13.878	0.176	0.382	-0.619	–
Bica et al.	2019	96.349	13.871	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	96.352	13.878	0.176	0.382	-0.619	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	96.346	13.87	–	-0.13	2.9	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	96.338	13.869	–	–	–	–
Tadross	2014	96.35	13.866	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	96.346	13.87	–	0.98	2.89	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	96.346	13.867	–	1.92	-3.01	21.0
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	96.35	13.866	–	–	–	–
Kronberger et al.	2006	96.352	13.866	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	96.346	13.87	–	0.98	2.89	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	4.89	2.21	–	722	-0.204	1472	–	2
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	631	–	2382	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	6.31	1.40	–	1995	–	561	–	2⁽¹⁾
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	6.31	1.40	–	1995	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	4.26	1.68	–	813	–	–	–	–
Zhong et al.	2020	4.89⁽¹⁾	2.23	–	8800	-0.204	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	4.89	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	4.89	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	5.30	2.23	–	631	–	–	–	–
Tadross	2014	3.44	2.21	–	500	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	5.30	2.23	–	631	–	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	4.60⁽¹⁾	1.83	–	891	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	3.44	2.21	–	501	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2