Stock 3

(MWSC 108; OCL 318)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.27 UTI
0.26
CN
0.05
Cdens
0.25
CC3
0.39
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 3.3 [pc], 0.2 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.26 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 0.05 Very loose
  • CC3 0.25 Low quality
  • Clit 0.39 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Stock 3 is a poorly populated, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~3.39 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.36 kpc).

âš ī¸ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (Cdup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 18.049 62.298 0.295 -1.86 -0.372 -61.365
Almeida et al. 2025 18.059 62.319 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 18.027 62.255 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 18.059 62.319 0.265 -1.895 -0.357 –
Bica et al. 2019 18.0 62.286 – – – –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – -2.37 -0.07 –
Dib et al. 2018 18.037 62.258 – – – –
Sampedro et al. 2017 18.075 62.333 – -1.96 1.68 –
Joshi et al. 2016 18.037 62.258 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 18.027 62.255 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 18.075 62.333 – -1.94 1.54 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 18.037 62.258 – -0.13 -0.64 -6.0
Kharchenko et al. 2012 18.037 62.258 – -0.13 -0.64 -6.0
Dias et al. 2002 18.075 62.333 – -0.94 1.82 -6.0
Lynga 1987 18.073 62.334 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.36 2.23 – 71 -0.100 278 – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.75 2.35 – 17 – 498 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 71 – 57 – –
Dias et al. 2021 2.75 2.35 – 17 -0.100 – – –
Dib et al. 2018 1.36 – – 71 – – – –
Joshi et al. 2016 1.36 2.23 – 71 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.36 2.23 – 71 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.36 2.23 – 71 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 1.36 2.23 – 71 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.36 2.23 – 71 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸