Stock 3
(MWSC 108; OCL 318)
0.34
UTI
0.26
CN
0.11
Cdens
0.25
CC3
0.55
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
6.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.26 Poorly populated
- Cdens 0.11 Very loose
- CC3 0.25 Low quality
- Clit 0.55 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Stock 3 is a poorly populated, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
(*): The parallax distance estimate (~3.39 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.36 kpc).
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 18.049 | 62.298 | 0.295 | -1.86 | -0.372 | -61.365 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 18.059 | 62.319 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 18.027 | 62.255 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 18.059 | 62.319 | 0.265 | -1.895 | -0.357 | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 18.0 | 62.286 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 18.027 | 62.255 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 18.075 | 62.333 | â | -1.94 | 1.54 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 18.037 | 62.258 | â | -0.13 | -0.64 | -6.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 18.037 | 62.258 | â | -0.13 | -0.64 | -6.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 18.075 | 62.333 | â | -0.94 | 1.82 | -6.0 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.75 | 2.35 | â | 17 | â | 498 | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 71 | â | 57 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.75 | 2.35 | â | 17 | -0.100 | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.36 | 2.19 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.36 | 2.19 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 1.36 | 2.19 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.36 | 2.19 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.