Stock 2

(MWSC 173; FoF 2408; OCSN 265)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 49.4 [arcmin]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Stock 2 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Very close Moderate extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 33.861 59.556 2.669 15.838 -13.729 8.817
Li et al. 2025 33.856 59.522 2.641 15.966 -13.627 –
Wei et al. 2025 33.892 59.542 2.662 15.811 -13.729 –
Almeida et al. 2025 33.853 59.537 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 33.865 59.523 2.645 15.824 -13.754 –
Zhang et al. 2024 33.85 59.577 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 33.85 59.577 2.675 15.829 -13.713 8.168
Cavallo et al. 2024 33.768 59.545 2.671 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 33.85 59.577 2.675 15.829 -13.713 8.168
Qin et al. 2023 33.88 59.52 2.68 15.82 -13.78 8.57
Just et al. 2023 33.648 59.438 – – – –
He et al. 2022 33.899 59.56 2.674 15.812 -13.75 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 33.88 59.45 2.662 15.816 -13.748 –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 33.813 59.542 2.665 15.886 -13.599 –
Rain et al. 2021 33.856 59.522 2.641 15.966 -13.627 –
Dias et al. 2021 33.853 59.537 2.641 15.845 -13.698 8.757
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 33.856 59.522 2.641 15.966 -13.627 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 33.856 59.522 2.641 15.966 -13.627 –
Liu & Pang 2019 33.832 59.562 2.638 15.841 -13.673 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 33.856 59.522 – – – 8.19
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 33.856 59.522 2.641 15.966 -13.627 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 33.675 59.485 – 1.744 -1.948 1.8
Kharchenko et al. 2016 33.648 59.438 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 33.679 59.485 – -0.24 -0.51 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 33.66 59.44 – 16.13 -14.5 1.8
Gozha et al. 2012 33.679 59.485 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 33.66 59.44 – 16.13 -14.5 1.81
Piskunov et al. 2008 33.588 59.263 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 33.67 59.49 – 2.8 – -2.85
Piskunov et al. 2007 33.588 59.263 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 33.6 59.267 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 33.6 59.27 – 16.22 -13.39 -2.85
Kharchenko et al. 2003 33.69 59.39 – 16.49 -13.16 –
Dias et al. 2002 33.679 59.485 – 17.29 -13.1 -41.14

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.37 0.81 – 606 0.054 – – –
Wei et al. 2025 0.42 1.01 – 245 0.250 1520 0.59 –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.37 0.79 – 804 – 1753 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.40 0.50 – 1094 0.032 – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.081* – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 3319* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.38 1.23 – 234 0.290 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.36 0.90 2.02 290 – – – –
Qin et al. 2023 0.50 0.78 – 355 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 275 – 2075 – –
He et al. 2022 – 1.30 – 282 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.43 – – 398 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 0.38* – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 0.37 1.18 – 170 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 0.37 0.79 – 804 0.029 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.40 0.50 – 398 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.37 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 676 0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.37 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.37 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.39 1.04 – 164 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.40 1.05 – 275 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.40 1.05 – 275 -0.140 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.30 – – 170 -0.140 9772 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 0.40 1.05 – 275 -0.140 – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.38 1.05 – 148 – 24155* – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 0.38 1.05 – 148 – 12677 – –
van den Bergh 2006 0.30 1.18 – 170 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.38 1.05 – 148 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 0.30 1.18 – – – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.30 1.18 – 170 -0.140 – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸