Stock 16

0.53 UTI

0.31

C_N

0.1

C_dens

0.25

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification CC

Number of members (P>50%) 31

Radius (P>50% members) 6.2 [arcmin]

C_N 0.31 Poorly populated
C_dens 0.1 Very loose
C_C3 0.25 Low quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Stock 16 is a poorly populated, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a very young cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~4.40 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.81 kpc).

Relatively close Moderate extinction Very young

Data

🔍 Search references for Stock 16 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	199.773	-62.615	0.228	-6.54	-0.972	-31.499
Celli et al.	2024	199.86	-62.622	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	199.682	-62.583	0.501	-4.178	-1.796	–
Rain et al.	2021	199.86	-62.622	0.222	-6.574	-0.991	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	199.86	-62.622	0.222	-6.574	-0.991	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	199.86	-62.622	0.222	-6.574	-0.991	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	199.86	-62.622	–	–	–	-38.11
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	199.86	-62.622	0.222	-6.574	-0.991	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	199.875	-62.633	–	-8.407	2.036	-41.8
Dias et al.	2014	199.871	-62.633	–	-8.97	-3.36	–
Gozha et al.	2012	199.871	-62.633	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	199.691	-62.505	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	199.87	-62.63	–	0.22	–	-41.8
van den Bergh	2006	199.7	-62.517	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	199.69	-62.51	–	-3.31	-0.03	-41.8
Kharchenko et al.	2003	199.69	-62.51	–	-3.58	0.15	–
Dias et al.	2002	199.871	-62.633	–	-8.97	-3.36	-41.8
Dambis	1999	199.871	-62.633	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	6	–	340	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	1.99*	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	3.99	1.61	–	8	–	–	–	0
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	3.99	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	3.99	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	3.99	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	1.66	1.54	–	8	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	1.81	–	–	8	–	1413	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	1.64	1.49	–	6	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	1.64	1.52	–	8	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	1.64	1.49	–	6	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	1.64	1.24	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.81	1.61	–	8	–	–	–	–
Dambis	1999	1.85	1.45	–	3	–	–	–	–

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2