Stock 14
(MWSC 1968)
0.95
UTI
0.75
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
4.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.75 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Stock 14 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 175.911 | -62.545 | 0.394 | -6.403 | 0.73 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 175.925 | -62.537 | 0.385 | -6.388 | 0.714 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 175.931 | -62.527 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 175.925 | -62.533 | 0.383 | -6.428 | 0.747 | -9.011 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 175.896 | -62.557 | 0.389 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 175.925 | -62.533 | 0.383 | -6.428 | 0.747 | -9.011 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 175.945 | -62.533 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 175.943 | -62.516 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 175.924 | -62.543 | 0.417 | -6.414 | 0.711 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 175.925 | -62.537 | 0.385 | -6.388 | 0.714 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 175.931 | -62.527 | 0.387 | -6.384 | 0.711 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 175.925 | -62.537 | 0.385 | -6.388 | 0.714 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 175.925 | -62.537 | 0.385 | -6.388 | 0.714 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 175.95 | -62.517 | 0.391 | -6.364 | 0.847 | -3.98 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 175.925 | -62.537 | 0.385 | -6.388 | 0.714 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 175.95 | -62.517 | â | -5.93 | 0.82 | -8.6 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 175.943 | -62.516 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 175.95 | -62.517 | â | -4.92 | -6.17 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 175.95 | -62.52 | â | -5.82 | 1.2 | -8.6 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 175.95 | -62.517 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 175.936 | -62.513 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 175.95 | -62.52 | â | 0.12 | â | -8.83 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 175.95 | -62.517 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 175.95 | -62.52 | â | -5.49 | 1.2 | -8.83 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 175.95 | -62.49 | â | -6.82 | 0.87 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 175.949 | -62.452 | â | -5.93 | 0.82 | -4.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 175.95 | -62.517 | â | -5.93 | 0.82 | -12.91 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 175.95 | -62.517 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.07 | 0.69 | â | 17 | -0.146 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.29 | 0.94 | â | 14 | â | 164 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 774* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.03 | 0.90 | â | 15 | -0.210 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.34 | 0.65 | 1.13 | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.24 | 0.88 | â | 18 | 0.152 | 557* | 0.64 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 6 | â | 1578 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.23* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.42 | 0.65 | â | 20 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.29 | 0.94 | â | 14 | 0.116 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.40 | 0.40 | â | 36 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 1.99 | 0.87 | â | 16 | -0.642 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.15 | 0.70 | â | 11 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.45 | 0.97 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.45 | 0.97 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.15 | â | â | 11 | â | 676 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 2.15 | 0.68 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 2.15 | 0.68 | â | 11 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 2.15 | 0.68 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 2.15 | 0.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 2.15 | â | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.40 | 0.65 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 2.17 | 0.76 | â | 11 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.