Stock 10

(MWSC 616; OCSN 266)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.97 UTI
0.86
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
C3 classification AA
Number of members (P>50%) 403
Radius (P>50% members) 41.5 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.86 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique
đŸ“Ĩ Members 📊 Colab đŸ”Ŧ Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (Îą, δ) 🔍 Simbad (Îą, δ)

Overview
ℹī¸
Stock 10 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a low-mass, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Very close Low extinction Low mass Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data
🔍 Search references for Stock 10 in: SciX Simbad
ℹī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 84.85 37.808 2.785 -3.139 -0.429 -13.534
Li et al. 2025 84.808 37.85 2.759 -3.114 -0.464 –
Almeida et al. 2025 84.835 37.86 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 84.841 37.793 2.759 -3.153 -0.424 –
Zhang et al. 2024 84.742 37.808 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 84.742 37.808 2.794 -3.15 -0.428 -12.7
Cavallo et al. 2024 84.907 37.75 2.8 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 84.742 37.808 2.794 -3.15 -0.428 -12.7
Almeida et al. 2023 84.938 37.882 – – – –
Qin et al. 2023 84.88 37.78 2.8 -3.16 -0.43 -13.58
Just et al. 2023 84.8 37.805 – – – –
He et al. 2022 84.855 37.854 2.795 -3.155 -0.417 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 84.693 37.692 2.789 -3.155 -0.417 –
Dias et al. 2021 84.835 37.86 2.748 -3.153 -0.476 -12.592
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 84.808 37.85 2.759 -3.114 -0.464 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 84.808 37.85 2.759 -3.114 -0.464 –
Bossini et al. 2019 84.808 37.85 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 84.808 37.85 – – – -11.67
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 84.808 37.85 2.759 -3.114 -0.464 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 84.75 37.934 – -1.49 -4.44 -8.16
Kharchenko et al. 2016 84.8 37.805 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 84.75 37.933 – -1.49 -4.44 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 84.81 37.805 – -1.18 -2.0 -8.2
Gozha et al. 2012 84.75 37.933 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 84.81 37.805 – -1.18 -2.0 -8.16
Piskunov et al. 2008 84.739 37.926 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 84.75 37.93 – 0.32 – -8.66
Piskunov et al. 2007 84.739 37.926 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 84.75 37.933 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 84.75 37.93 – -3.34 -1.57 -8.15
Kharchenko et al. 2003 84.67 37.81 – -2.48 -3.66 –
Dias et al. 2002 84.75 37.933 – -1.49 -4.44 -8.16

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.36 0.54 – 96 -0.042 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.36 0.47 – 233 – 205 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.37 0.44 – 84 -0.004 – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.087* – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 329* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.37 0.77 – 74 0.000 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.34 0.29 0.89 135 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.35 0.68 – 136 -0.120 194* 0.42 –
Qin et al. 2023 0.42 0.50 – 89 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 263 – 38 – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.50 – 79 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.37 – – 83 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.36 0.47 – 233 -0.004 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.37 0.44 – 81 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.36 – – – – – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 0.33 0.26 – 115 0.000 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.36 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.36 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.38 0.22 – 79 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.50 0.24 – 263 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.50 0.24 – 263 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.38 – – 79 – 42 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 0.50 0.24 – 263 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.38 0.25 – 263 – 42* – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 0.38 0.25 – 263 – 13 – –
van den Bergh 2006 0.38 0.19 – 224 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.38 0.25 – 263 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 0.67 0.62 – – – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.38 0.22 – 79 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization
ℹī¸
Stock 10 UCC
Stock 10 HUNT23
Stock 10 CANTAT20
Galactocentric position diagram